GMO Food for Thought

UK’s Soil Association Responds to “Organic Myths” Article

Abstract: The UK organic organization The Soil Association responded to last week’s article on organic myths. A member posted this article while another argued that there will always been anti-organic advocates claiming one thing and organic advocates countering these claims with “peer-reviewed studies.” The member suggested that a non-interested party look at all the information available and “give a verdict.”

Source: The First Post (UK)

European Parliament Committee Chair Neil Parish Calls for Ban on GM Feed to be Lifted

Abstract: A member posted an article from the Irish Examiner on the need for the European Commission to lift the ban on genetically modified feed stuffs. Livestock owners feel that it is difficult to compete in the global market because they have to may a lot more for animal feed that does not contain GM ingredients. Another point made in the article is that 90 percent of the meat imported into the EU is from cattle fed GM animal feed, making it cheaper to sell.

Source: Irish Examiner

Posted by CS Prakash at 9:41 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

UK’s The Independent Publishes Article on Organic Food Myths

Abstract: The British newspaper The Independent published a really good article on the many “myths” associated with organic food. Included in the lists is that organic farming is good for the environment, organic farming doesn’t use pesticides and organic food is healthier. Several members commented that US mainstream media does not like to write negatively about organics; some think it is because organic is “trendy” so reporters don’t want to write negatively about it.

Source: The Independent

Researchers in Germany test genetically modified potatoes on humans

Abstract: The European Journal of Nutrition recently published an article on a trial in Germany with potatoes that are genetically modified to produce more zeaxanthin, a protein that helps protect the eyes from blue light damage. Three men participated in this randomized, controlled double-blinded, crossover pilot study. The study found that consumption of eaxanthin-rich potatoes significantly increases chylomicron zeaxanthin concentrations suggesting that potentially such potatoes could be used as an important dietary source of zeaxanthin.

Source: National Institute of Health

Posted by CS Prakash at 5:42 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

New York Times Articles on Biotechnology and Organics Gain Attention Online

Abstract: The New York Times published an article of particular interest to AgBioWorld Members titled “In Lean Times, Biotech Grains Are Less Taboo.” The article has been reposted by numerous bloggers around the Web and has been a hot topic of conversation. A few days earlier the NYT published an article on the rising cost of organic food. This article was discussed broadly within the group.

Sources: “In Lean Times, Biotech Grains Are Less Taboo”
“Sticker Shock in the Organic Aisles”

Swiss “Dignity” Law Discussed

Abstract: Nature recently published an article on a “dignity” law in Switzerland. The law requires the federal government's ethics committee on non-human biotechnology to map out guidelines to help granting agencies decide which research applications deeply offend the dignity of plants. If it does not pass, the research will become “unfundable.” According to the article,

“All plant biotechnology grant applications must now include a paragraph explaining the extent to which plant dignity is considered. ‘But scientists don't know what it means,’ says Beat Keller of the Institute of Plant Biology at the University of Zurich.”

Members had a lot to say about this law, mostly criticizing the “absurdity” of it. A member also noted that the concept originated in the Netherlands, though their version is a little different. Another member posted a link to a workshop being held at the World Congress on the Future of Food and Agriculture Conference in Bonn, Germany, May 12 – 16, 2008.

Sources: Nature
“The Dignity of Living Beings” brochure produced by Switzerland (PDF)
“Rediscover the Plant: A scientific and ethical discourse” Workshop

GM Canola Seeds Sell Out in Australia

Abstract: A member posted a news article reporting that genetically modified canola appears to be a success in parts of Australia, as all available GM canola seed have sold out for autumn planting in New South Wales. One member cautioned that victory can not be declared yet, as there are some farmers that are threatening to sue of contamination occurred. Another member responded, saying that the chances of contamination in Australia are lower than that in other countries due to the location of the farmers. Also, since the farms are closer to the coasts, activists that are behind the farmers threats are less likely to check farms that are hours away from big cities.

Source: ABC Central West (AU)

Posted by CS Prakash at 1:17 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

Chinese Farmers and Bt Cotton

Abstract: A member wrote that he came across a newspaper article on a Cornell study that claimed Chinese farmers planting Bt cotton were loosing money. Noting that the article which appeared to be recent was actually a couple years old, the member asked for more information on the study. He also asked if the study was correct, why Chinese farmers continue to use Bt cotton despite being less profitable. Another member responded by saying that the study did not look at all aspects of farming, i.e. amount of pesticides used, health of the farmer, time spent in the fields, and said that he had seen another paper saying that more Chinese farmers are planting GM cotton. He also pointed to the recent ISAAA report on the current state of GM crops in the world for more information.

Source: Cornell University

Asia Embraces Biotechnology, Despite United Nations

Abstract: A member posted an article written by Henry Miller for the Far Eastern Economic Review. Miller criticizes the United Nations for ignoring scientific evidence on the positive impact of genetically modified crops, saying that several U.N. agencies have “conducted a senseless and destructive war on GM.” Using Asia as an example, Miller touts the benefits GM crops have brought to farmers worldwide. Several members responded to the article post by encouraging others to pass the article along to others.

Source: The Far Eastern Economic Review

Members Respond to Positive Article on Lack of Peer-Reviewed Studies

Abstract: A member posted another article by Henry Miller that appeared in The Guardian (UK). Miller discusses the need for trustworthy, prominent journals to work harder to ensure that the studies they publish are credible. He cites four well known studies that were put into question after flaws in research were found. Miller states that a better system of peer-review by unbiased scientists are needed to ensure the validity of future studies. Several members of the group commented on the importance of this article, saying that they plan to use it to “refute fake arguments.”

Source: The Guardian

Wormy Sweet Corn Study Debate Resurfaces in Canada

Abstract: An opinion article by Stephen Strauss appeared on CBC News (Canada) on an eight year old study that compared genetically modified “bt” sweet corn and conventional sweet corn in Canada. The controversial study supposedly included signs that described the conventional corn as “wormy sweet corn” and the Bt corn as “quality sweet corn.” Strauss agrees that the placement of these signs was an “error in judgment” by the researchers, but encourages those calling for the study to be retracted to conduct a study of their own without the signs and compare the results. Anti-GM activist Joe Cummins wrote a letter in response to the article noting that he had not been contacted despite his name being used in the article and argued that the call for retraction had more to do with how the study was conducted than the results. Members of AgBioWorld commented on this article saying that many of the people against this study are environmentalists who are often misinformed about what genetic modification really is. One member also mentioned a similar study involving genetically modified potatoes that was conducted in Price Edward Island, Canada, but was never published.

Source: CBC News

AgBioWorld is comprised of ag-biotech experts who take a keen interest in the latest news and events important to ag-biotech. This blog aims to be a reflection of those events and news stories that have captured our attention. Please share your comments and feelings on the current climate for biotech with us as well.

Best regards,

C.S. Prakash

Posted by CS Prakash at 4:41 PM | Permalink | Comments (0)

UK May Soon Conceal Locations of GM Crops

Abstract: The Guardian posted an article on the possibility that Britain may soon be concealing the locations of GM crop field trials. This is in response to requests by biotechnology companies that field trial location information is too easily made available to activists who burn these fields in protest.

Source: The Guardian (UK)

India Supreme Court Allows GM Field Trial Submissions

Abstract: The Supreme Court in New Delhi ruled last week that biotechnology companies may seek permission from the regulatory body - Genetic Engineering Advisory Committee (GEAC) - for fresh trials, including open field trials of new GM crops. Members commented that this is great news and provided additional articles reporting on the subject.

Sources: The Times of India
Indian Express
Additional article from The Times of India

Posted by CS Prakash at 9:35 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

Germany Makes it “Easier” for Farmers to Plant GM Corn

Abstract: Bloomberg reported that Germany passed legislation that supposedly makes it easier for farmers to plant genetically modified corn, though Monsanto disagrees. The legislation calls for farmers who want to sow MON180 to set a 150 meter ``safety zone'' between the plots growing GM corn and neighbors who've sown regular GM-free corn. “Farmers need to draw up a zone of 300 meters around plots adjacent to organic crops. Farmers will also be obliged to report in an Internet register plans to sow the seeds three months before the April-May planting season.” Monsanto argues that this will make it easier for activists eager to burn down GM crop fields to find them, making farmers more hesitant to plant the genetically modified corn.

Source: Bloomberg

Tear-Free Onions Coming Soon?

Abstract:Scientists in New Zealand and Japan announced that they have created the first “tear-free” onion with the help of genetic modification. The scientist used biotechnology to silence the gene responsible for the enzyme that makes us cry. Colin Eady, the institute's senior scientist, was quoted as saying that they hope that by silencing this gene the compounds normally created will be redirected into compounds responsible for flavor and health. The onion will not, however, be available for 10 to 15 years to consumers.

Source: AFP

Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Increases Funding to Improve Agricultural Production

Abstract: A member posted an article from the Puget Sound Business Journal on an announcement Bill Gates made during his speech at the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland last month. Gates announced that his foundation, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, would be increasing funding “to improve agricultural production in poor countries around the world.” The majority of the $306 million grant, $164.5 million will go to the Alliance for a Green Revolution in Africa (AGRA) “to help Africa's small farmers increase yields of stable food crops. The grant will focus on improving soil fertility, which could increase crop yields for 4.1 million people.” The remainder of the package, $141.5 million will be divided among five organizations: CARE in Atlanta, Heifer International of Little Rock, Ark., International Development Enterprises of Lakewood, Colo., the International Rice Research Institute based in Manila, and TechnoServe, a rural business development organization based in Washington, D.C. After seeing this article another member posted an article from the Wall Street Journal in which Gates says he was inspired by biotechnology pioneer Norman Borlaug.

Sources: Puget Sound Business Journal
Wall Street Journal (subscription required)

Posted by CS Prakash at 1:45 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

Wired Magazine Discusses “GMO 2.0”

Abstract: Wired Magazine posted an article on the addition of nutritional traits to consumer products, rather than traits that benefit farmers such as glyphosate resistance. The author coins the term “GMO 2.0” when describing the nutritional traits. Several members agreed that they should co-opt the use of this term in order to give a positive connotation to the usually negative acronym of GMO. One member suggested sending a letter to the editor of Wired, using golden rice as an example of GMO 2.0.

Sources: Wired Magazine

Opponents of RR Sugar Beets File Lawsuit Against USDA

Abstract: Members posted and discussed articles announcing a lawsuit filed against the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) challenging the approval of Monsanto’s Roundup Ready sugar beets. The lawsuit was filed by the Center for Food Safety, the Sierra Club and two organic seed groups and claims that RR sugar beets will lead to more glyphosate resistant weeds due to wind pollination. One member commented that he believed that “sugar beets were biennial, so cross-pollination would only be a potential issue for bolters and seed farms,” meaning not much of a risk at all.

Sources: Reuters
Capital Press

Members Applaud Decision by Biotechnology Companies to Pull Out of IAAST

Abstract: Nature published an article on the decision by Monsanto and Syngenta to pull out of the International Assessment of Agricultural Science and Technology (IAAST). The group is currently working on writing reports that “promise to map how science, technology and accumulated good-farming practice can be used to reduce hunger and improve quality of life for rural people in developing countries.” The two companies are speculated to have left because the reports did not place much emphasis on the positive aspects of biotechnology. One member applauded the decisions of Monsanto and Syngenta, saying that they made the right decision since the group does not believe biotechnology has much value.

Source: Nature

AgBioWorld is comprised of ag-biotech experts who take a keen interest in the latest news and events important to ag-biotech. This blog aims to be a reflection of those events and news stories that have captured our attention. Please share your comments and feelings on the current climate for biotech with us as well.

Best regards,

C.S. Prakash

Posted by CS Prakash at 3:31 AM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

Members Discuss California Raw Milk Lawsuit

Abstract: A member posted an article from Cheese Market News titled “Lawsuit filed over new raw milk standards in California,” which discusses a lawsuit filed by Organic Pastures and Claravale Farms, two raw milk bottlers, over a new legislation that could essentially shut them down. The article states, “In October, the state assembly approved AB1735, which established new standards for coliform bacteria in raw milk sold to consumers. Effective Jan. 1, raw milk sold at the retail level may have a count of no more than 10 coliform bacteria per milliliter in the final product, the same as pasteurized milk.” The raw milk producers are asking that this law be declared “unconstitutional.” The member suggested that those in California consider writing opinion pieces for California newspapers in response to this lawsuit.

French Scientists Argue that the Government is “Misrepresenting” Findings in GM Corn Debate

Abstract: Members discussed an article that appeared in the French press on the “doubts” France’s Provisional High Authority had for the safety of Monsanto’s genetically engineered corn Mon 810. The article that started the discussion reported that, “12 of the 15 scientists who compiled the authority's report issued a statement complaining that Le Grand had misrepresented their findings.” Another member pointed out that much of the French press appeared to be behind the 12 scientists, disagreeing that Mon 810 is dangerous. Finally a member translated a statement from the French Association for Scientific Information (AFIS) on their stance concerning the misrepresentation.

Sources:
AFP article
AFIS statement (In French)

AgBioWorld is comprised of ag-biotech experts who take a keen interest in the latest news and events important to ag-biotech. This blog aims to be a reflection of those events and news stories that have captured our attention. Please share your comments and feelings on the current climate for biotech with us as well.

Best regards,

C.S. Prakash

Posted by CS Prakash at 11:20 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

Pope’s Message Positive Towards Biotechnology

Abstract: A member posted a link to an excerpt of the Pope’s "Message of His Holiness Pope Benedict XVI for the Celebration of the World Day of Peace." The member noted that this was a positive piece and encouraged others to distribute it widely. He pulled on a specific quote from the piece that he felt best represented the positive aspect of the message.

"We need to care for the environment: it has been entrusted to men and
women to be protected and cultivated with responsible freedom, with the
good of all as a constant guiding criterion. Human beings, obviously,
are of supreme worth vis-à-vis creation as a whole. Respecting the
environment does not mean considering material or animal nature more
important than man. Rather, it means not selfishly considering nature to
be at the complete disposal of our own interests, for future generations
also have the right to reap its benefits and to exhibit towards nature
the same responsible freedom that we claim for ourselves."

Source: Vatican Web site

Norman Borlaug Nominated as Possible Washington Post “Noblest People of the Year”

Abstract: A member posted a link and short excerpt from a Technology Review article on the accomplishments of Norman Borlaug, founder of modern biotechnology. The article discusses his first attempts at breading a better wheat crop. The article also discusses the criticism he received from around the world. In response to this article another member posted a link to a Washington Post contest, Noblest People of the Year, in which Borlaug is part of. Readers of the Washington Post have been asked to pick three from the list. The member encouraged fellow members to vote for Borlaug.

Sources: Technology Review
Washington Post

Books as a Holiday Gift

Abstract: Members discussed the idea of giving books as a holiday gift for the person who “has everything.” One member suggested the book “On Bullshit” by Harry G. Frankfurt. He notes that while giving books as a gift can be “iffy” this book is only 67 pages long and since it is hard-bound, “it will look good on any shelf.” Another member suggested the book "Bad Thoughts", by Jamie Whyte.

Resources:
Bad Thoughts on Amazon
On Bullshit on Amazon

AgBioWorld is comprised of ag-biotech experts who take a keen interest in the latest news and events important to ag-biotech. This blog aims to be a reflection of those events and news stories that have captured our attention. Please share your comments and feelings on the current climate for biotech with us as well.

Best regards,

C.S. Prakash

Posted by CS Prakash at 3:11 PM | Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

Italian GM Field Trials Suppression Discussion Continues

Abstract: Members continue to discuss the suppression of findings from Italian GM field trials. The main topic of discussion continues to be the lack of coverage the story is receiving in the English speaking world. One member did post a number of sites that included articles about the issue, but most are not mainstream media or widely read outside the scientific community. An Italian scientist who is a member also chimed in with his views and noted that scientists from around the world and many scientific journals have been contacting on the issue.

NSW and Victoria, Australia lift bans on GM Crops

Abstract: An Australian AgBioWorld member posted an announcement that New South Wales and Victoria, Australia have both agreed to lift their respective bans on GM crops when the current moratoria ends early in 2008. Another member posted several Australian media articles about the lifting of the bans, with several negative comments about the announcement. Members agreed that while this is a positive development, there is still a chance these deals may fall through. Another member posted an article from the Herald Sun (Melbourne Tabloid) by Andrew Bolt attacking the credibility of popular anti-GM activist Jeffrey Smith. Members noted that while the article put a dent in Smith’s movement, they still have a long way to go.

Sources:

The Age

Sydney Morning Herald

The Weekly Times via GMO Pundit blog

Herald Sun


Organic vs. Conventional Food and Nutritional Value

Abstract: Members discuss the nutritional difference between organic and conventionally produced food. The original poster noted that while many people believe that more nutrients are present in organic food, in reality the only food that may have more nutritional value, the tomato, does not have a significant amount more. He notes that just by eating another orange or potato, one can get the same amount of extra vitamin C that many organic producers claim is present in organic tomatoes. Many of the members also questioned whether the extra money spent on organic food was really worth the alleged extra nutrients. Members also pointed to an article published by Vivian Moses, Visiting Professor of Biotechnology, King’s College London and Bruce Chassy, Professor of Food Microbiology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign on this topic.

AgBioWorld is comprised of ag-biotech experts who take a keen interest in the latest news and events important to ag-biotech. This blog aims to be a reflection of those events and news stories that have captured our attention. Please share your comments and feelings on the current climate for biotech with us as well.

Best regards,

C.S. Prakash

Posted by CS Prakash at 3:36 PM | Permalink

Italian Field Trial Results Suppressed

Abstract: Members discuss an announcement that Italian government officials and scientists withheld data from field trials comparing conventional and GM maize for two years. The data shows that Italian farmers have potentially forfeited between roughly 300 million and 1 billion Euros a year because of the continued ban on GM crops. One member posted a press release asking that other members distribute it widely, especially to those in the media. Another member posted a Food Navigator article on the issue.

Sources:

Press Release on the Announcement

Food Navigator article

The Truth about Fair Trade, Organic and Locally Produced

Abstract: A member of AgBioWorld distributed the criteria for fair trade, which includes a note about “harmful agrochemicals and GMOs” being “strictly prohibited.” The member also included an article from The Economist on the real impact of organic, fair trade and locally grown food.

Sources:

Fair Trade Certified Criteria

The Economist article

Maine Considers Rules for Regulating Bt Corn

Abstract: The Maine Board of Pesticides Control announced that it would hold a meeting to discuss proposed rules regulating the use of genetically modified corn. Several members suggested that at least one member of the group should go to the meeting and represent their opinions. The original article noted that those against the introduction of Bt corn in Maine would be in attendance, and likely citing a study that supposedly showed Bt corn causes the unintended increased mortality in aquatic species. The group agreed that someone needed to be there to counter the flawed research.

Source: Morning Sentinel (ME)

AgBioWorld is comprised of ag-biotech experts who take a keen interest in the latest news and events important to ag-biotech. This blog aims to be a reflection of those events and news stories that have captured our attention. Please share your comments and feelings on the current climate for biotech with us as well.

Best regards,

C.S. Prakash

Posted by CS Prakash at 3:39 PM | Permalink

Mexican National Autonomous University (UNAM) to Supervise GM Commodity Trade for Mexico

Abstract: Members discussed an announcement by the USDA that a Mexican university would take over supervision of trade in GM commodities, specifically for GM corn. The announcement notes that the “Mexican National Autonomous University (UNAM) will be in charge of supervising the flow of transgenic products into Mexico after winning the bid launched by the Mexican Commission for Protection against Sanitary Risks (COFEPRIS).” One member questioned whether this was a positive or negative development knowing the past actions of the university. Another member confirmed who was going to be in charge of the program at the University and speculated that if she just focuses on the science of it the US biotech industry should be fine. He did note, however that if pressured by activist she may just go along with them.

Source: Truth about Trade & Technology

Genetically Modified Rice in Question in China, GM or Not?

Abstract: Members discuss an article on genetically modified rice developed in China to help diabetes patients. One member asks if this would be considered agricultural biotechnology. Several members discussed the validity of this story, asking how a genetically modified rice crop could gain such rapid approval. It was finally concluded that this was not genetically modified rice, but rather rice that has been conventionally breed to help with the digestion process.

Source: Truth about Trade & Technology

AgBioWorld is comprised of ag-biotech experts who take a keen interest in the latest news and events important to ag-biotech. This blog aims to be a reflection of those events and news stories that have captured our attention. Please share your comments and feelings on the current climate for biotech with us as well.

Best regards,
C.S. Prakash

Posted by CS Prakash at 4:58 PM | Permalink

ASK-FORCE Created by AgBioWorld Member

Abstract: Members discuss the creation of “Ask-Force,” hosted on the Public Research and Regulation Initiative (PRRI) site, which serves as a forum to publish frequently asked questions that refer to publications that are either not supported by properly peer reviewed scientific research. The topics of the first three articles were posted and members suggested additional topics for the future.

ASK-FORCE Web site

Jeffrey Smith Coming to Australia

Abstract:One AgBioWorld member asked for other members to contributed information on Jeffrey Smith that can be distributed at a biotechnology debate in Australia that he is taking part in. Several members posted commentary on a blog post that appeared on Genetic Engineering & Biotechnology News’ Biotech Blog which refers to Jeffrey Smith’s allegations that GM food is not safe.

Members Discuss Credibility of Nature Biotechnology Article Author

Abstract: Members criticize the author of an article titled “A different perspective on GM food,” David Shubert. The article appeared in Nature Biotechnology and was reposted by a blogger. One member commented that he appeared to be “a nut” but since he has professional affiliation he is taken seriously.

Source: Mindfully.org

AgBioWorld is comprised of ag-biotech experts who take a keen interest in the latest news and events important to ag-biotech. This blog aims to be a reflection of those events and news stories that have captured our attention. Please share your comments and feelings on the current climate for biotech with us as well.

Best regards,
C.S. Prakash

Posted by CS Prakash at 3:39 PM | Permalink

Compiled by C.S. Prakash
October 12, 2007

The Independent Posts Interview with Kings College Faculty Member Calling GM Crops “Dangerous and Unnecessary”

Abstract: Members discuss the need for a response after the United Kingdom newspaper The Independent published an anti-biotech article interviewing an associate professor at Kings College. Dr. Michael Antoniou of Kings College argued that “genetically modified crops are dangerous and unnecessary.”

Several members expressed the need for a letter written not only to the newspaper but also the Dean of Kings College, pointing out the factual errors in the article. One member noted that another Associate Professor from a UK college published a similar article and after a letter was written to the University was forced to write a letter or apology for her “fear monger lies.” Finally, another member suggested, “Whoever writes to the Independent should point out that Antoniou is not describing GM, but rather mutation breeding, a system highly disruptive of the genome, and in which no one has any evidence of the genomic changes or risks, yet has been used for over half a century to generate over 2,000 crop cultivars with no known health or safety hazards reported, and therefore no need to banish.”

Link to original article in The Independent: http://news.independent.co.uk/education/higher/article2999527.ece

YouTube Video Posted by Member Predicted the “Demise of GM Crops”

Abstract: A member posted a video to YouTube containing a CBC News clip of OECD Summit on GMO safety in Edinburgh March 1, 2000, featuring a debate between Patrick Holden of the Soil Association Alan McHughen in which Holden predicts the demise of GM crops within five years.

One member suggests that other members leave comments on the YouTube video “in anticipation of the anti's getting their licks in first” since the video is on a public site.

Link to the YouTube video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cwE0cqdZWlY

Members Discuss YouTube video of Interview on Monsanto vs. Schmeiser Court Case

Abstract: A member posted a video to YouTube containing a CBC interview with Alan McHughen concerning genetically modified crops and the Monsanto vs. Percy Schmeiser court case. The interview originally aired in June of 2000. The video also contains a short spot on the British Royal Family’s views on GM crops.

One member commented that he agreed with Prince Phillip’s view that the introduction of exotic animals was more of a threat than genetically modified crops. The member stated that he felt “the greatest risks to biodiversity were (1) habitat destruction (including agriculture itself!) and (2) introduction of exotics.” He also asked Why the comparison of GE vs. 'traditional' agriculture not gain traction mainstream. Another member responded by saying that the closest thing to “traction” this issue receives is in the negative sense, with how much more of nature would need to be sacrificed to farming if less productive farm technologies were used.

Two other members commented on the subject, saying that “most people take for granted the status quo of agriculture's preemption of landscape-- some even lament it when farmland is abandoned and reverts to forest.”

Link to YouTube video being discussed: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zbAhdcfTuaA

AgBioWorld is comprised of ag-biotech experts who take a keen interest in the latest news and events important to ag-biotech. This blog aims to be a reflection of those events and news stories that have captured our attention. Please share your comments and feelings on the current climate for biotech with us as well.

Best regards,

C.S. Prakash

Posted by CS Prakash at 2:10 PM | Permalink

Compiled by C.S. Prakash
September 28, 2007

Members Discuss Credibility of Activist Jeffery Smith

Abstract: Members discuss an expose on Jeffery Smith, author of “Seeds of Deception” and Genetic Roulette” and well-known anti-biotech activist. The article discusses his lack of credibility when it comes to biotechnology.

Several members questioned the credibility of Smith by exposing his belief in levitation and occupation as a ballroom dance teacher.

Link to Smith expose: http://www.cgfi.org/cgficommentary/jeffrey-smith%20article

Attack on AgBioWorld Members’ Contributions to Nature Biotechnology Article

Abstract: Members discuss a letter written by Professor Emeritus Joe Cummins, University of Western Ontario in response to an article appearing in Nature Biotechnology. The article that appeared in the journal referenced the work of Dr. Irina Ermakova and was supposedly meant to be an article solely written by her. The journal decided to take a different approach to the article, which was noted, and invited others in to contribute to the article.

One member noted that Cummins accuses the editor of the journal of plagiarism and “loses marks for citing Wikipedia as a reference source.” The member also suggested that Cummins probably did not read the article because “the only sections that are in any shape attributed to Andrew Marshall were the first two paragraphs.”

Link to Cummins’ letter: http://www.gmwatch.org/archive2.asp?arcid=8295

AgBioWorld is comprised of ag-biotech experts who take a keen interest in the latest news and events important to ag-biotech. This blog aims to be a reflection of those events and news stories that have captured our attention. Please share your comments and feelings on the current climate for biotech with us as well.

Best regards,
C.S. Prakash

Posted by CS Prakash at 6:48 AM | Permalink

Compiled by C.S. Prakash, Ph.D.
September 17, 2007

AgBioworld is comprised of agbiotech experts who take a keen interest in the latest news and events important to ag-biotech. This blog aims to be a reflection of those events and news stories that have captured our attention. Please share your comments and feelings on the current climate for biotech with us as well.
Best regards,
C.S. Prakash

Members discuss GMO rat research

Abstract: Members discussed a British Medical Journal article in which a flawed GM research study concerning rats was the topic.

One member noted that the article needed to be distributed widely until people realize that “anti-biotech scientists starve their rats.” Another member said that he didn’t think that the researcher intentionally starved the rats in question, but merely made the mistake of substituting too much test material into the rat’s diet. The member did agree that the researcher was still negligent and cruel to the lab animals.

Link to article being discussed: http://www.bmj.com/cgi/reprint/319/7217/1089.pdf

Soil Association’s attack of scientist Shane Morris

Abstract: Member commented on a letter Shane Morris sent to Peter Melchett, Policy Director at the Soil Association in the UK in response to a letter written to James Wright, High Commissioner for Canada regarding Shane’s work. The letter asked the government of Canada to takes action against one of its employees, Shane Morris for causing two Web sites belonging to GM Watch and GMO Free Ireland to be shut down. Morris writes that he did not ask for the two sites to be shut down, but merely asked that defamatory comments about him on the Web sites be taken down. Their failure to do so is what caused to sites to be shut down.

One member commented that he found it interesting that the Soil Association, having anointed itself a defender of the right to free speech, is demanding that Canada take action against someone for engaging in free speech.

Link to Peter Melchett’s letter: http://www.gmwatch.org/archive2.asp?arcid=8256.

Pro-GM Farmers Assaulted with Tear Gas at Protest

Abstract: Members discussed an article in the Belfast Telegraph concerning the use of tear gas and batons on a group of pro-GM French farmers who wanted to protest an anti-GM picnic.

Several members questioned why such force was used on pro-GM farmers on public property and not on anti-GM protesters when they burn down fields of biotech crops, on private property. One member also noted that many Americans are not aware of this activity because it is not occurring in the US, mainly only in France and due to the language barrier Americans aren’t reading the articles.

Link to Belfast Telegraph article: http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/world-news/article2898542.ece

Posted by CS Prakash at 11:07 PM | Permalink

Compiled by C.S. Prakash, Ph.D.
September 12, 2007

AgBioworld is comprised of agbiotech experts who take a keen interest in the latest news and events important to ag-biotech. This blog aims to be a reflection of those events and news stories that have captured our attention. Please share your comments and feelings on the current climate for biotech with us as well.
Best regards,

C.S. Prakash

AstroBiotech
Abstract: Biotech has made its way to space!
One member commented that the Chinese have claimed amazing results from their project of shooting seeds into orbit.

A story on space watermelons ready to harvest can be found here:
Space watermelons ready to harvest
Angela Xu, Shanghai Daily, July 18, 2007
http://www.shanghaidaily.com/sp/article/2007/200707/20070718/article_323800.htm

GM Growing Faster Than Organic

Abstract: AgBioworld members offered several comments regarding an article about French GMO area.

One member noted that organic corn is hard to find in France because organic crops are more popular. While another commented that it would be nice if they could analyze the inflated organic claims next to the biotech acreage growth data.
See the article below, and the Guest ed. note which follows it (from AgBioView):

French GMO Area May Keep Rising Sharply - Growers
Sybille de La Hamaide, Reuters via Planet Ark, July 20, 2007
http://www.planetark.com/dailynewsstory.cfm/newsid/43181/story.htm

Glofish
Abstract: Glofish created quite a stir among members recently.

One member was so intrigued that he went out a bought a couple. He also noted that the site advertising the fish gives a background on the science behind it and also provides classroom resources with lesson plans for teachers. He also encourages other members to help local teachers to purchase GloFish for use in the classroom.

Another member pointed out a section of the Web site that explains why GloFish are not available in California. According to the Web site, California currently enforces a statewide ban on the sale, possession, and import of transgenic aquatic organisms. The makers of GloFish appealed this ban but were denied. They decided that going through the approval would be too costly and decided not to pursue it. Someone else in the group thanked this member for pointing this out and suggested that the GloFish example may be worthy of comment by Sense about Science, an independent charitable trust that responds to “the misrepresentation of science and scientific evidence on issues that matter to society.”

Here’s a link to the GloFish site: http://www.glofish.com/buy.asp

Posted by CS Prakash at 5:53 PM | Permalink

Compiled by C.S. Prakash, Ph.D.
September 6, 2007

AgBioworld is comprised of agbiotech experts who take a keen interest in the latest news and events important to ag-biotech. This blog aims to be a reflection of those events and news stories that have captured our attention. Please share your comments and feelings on the current climate for biotech with us as well.
Best regards,

C.S. Prakash

Without U.S. Rules, Biotech Food Lacks Investors

Abstract: A recent Andrew Pollack news article in the NY Times drew some criticism from the group.

One member commented that in order to supposedly balance comments from the industry, he quoted Joe Medelson (Center for Food Safety), Margaret Mellon (Union of Concerned Scientists) and Carol Tucker Foreman (Consumer Federation of America's (CFA) Food Policy Institute), as well as the anonymous ‘critics say…’

Another member revealed that upon “tallying” Pollack’s sources he found that there were 2 government spokesperson from the FDA cited, 2 or more, less neutral academics, 3 “whacktivists” (Mendelson, Mellon and Carol Tucker Foreman) and 4 industry folks. The member noted that in addition to the overall tone of the story not being positive, the majority of the quotes, even from the FDA and industry officials are either negative or “defensively pointing out how much they have done to convince FDA of safety.”

Yet another member points out that while the article does not appear to be positive that does not mean that positive quotes were not given. The member reminds the group that the author picks the quotes therefore there is no way of knowing if positive quotes were given.

A link to the article can be found here:

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/30/washington/30animal.html?ex=1186891200&en=769045980a8ecb36&ei=5070

"Infringing and trespassing plants. Patented seeds at dispute in Canada's courts"

Abstract: Members question whether Percy Schmeiser’s case against Monsanto is being “mischaracterized” by some law publications.

One member notes that they stumbled upon a Web page of the Canadian Organic Activists who are trying to sue Monsanto and Bayer. The site includes links to numerous articles, some of which have been published in reputable scholarly law publications.

Another member points out that the most “insidious incorrect ‘fact’ being distributed” by organic activists is that the GM canola was ‘blown’ into Schmeiser’s fields. He criticizes these law journals for not being concerned “about either factual accuracy or scientific understanding.” He then goes on to list four authors who are not stating the facts of the case. He notes that two of the authors don’t “care one bit about facts or about science” and that they are merely preaching against Monsanto as a corporation.

Read the article here:

http://www.saskorganic.com/oapf/

Posted by CS Prakash at 11:06 PM | Permalink

For those of you subscribing to our web site through our RSS Feed, we have some news for you. We've recently moved over to Feedburner to better serve our visitors. You can reach this new feed by clicking the "Subscribe to RSS Feed" link on the right or by going to http://feeds.feedburner.com/GmoFoodForThought. If you are currently subscribing to GMO Food For Thought, we ask that you move over to this new system.

Thank you.

Posted by CS Prakash at 10:47 AM | Permalink

I mentioned a few months back that a very credible group would be taking over the blog and I'm happy to announce Dr. C.S. Prakash and AgBioWorld have agreed to adopt the GMO Food For Thought blog. You should see the first post from Dr. Prakash later today. Thanks again for visiting and please give Dr. Prakash a warm welcome!

Alisa

Posted by AC Baumer at 2:11 AM | Permalink

As I’ve participated over the past year in this discussion, I’ve learned a great deal and met many interesting people. My work schedule is preventing me from giving GMO Food for Thought the attention I think it deserves. One of the most credible and responsible groups with whom I’ve started corresponding has agreed to help update and take on day-to-day responsibilities by sharing the comments of their ongoing academically oriented discussions about GMOs. As time permits I’ll be posting; however, you’ll soon see new content and expanded views.

Alisa

Posted by AC Baumer at 8:38 AM | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBacks (0)